axcess.me™
Anchor of the Rust Belt

If Missouri is a bellwether, Ohio is a swing state – close presidential elections have hinged on the outcome here.

Here’s my Ohio disclaimer for Rasmussen. In 2004, Rasmussen polling showed Bush defeating Kerry in Ohio by a 50% to 46% margin, Bush won 51% to 49%. In the 2006 Ohio race for US Senate, Rasmussen showed Sherrod Brown beating Mike DeWine by 11 points, 54% to 43%, and Brown won by twelve, 56% to 44%. In 2008, Rasmussen showed Obama and McCain tied at 49% in Ohio, in a race Obama won 51% to 47%. All well within the margin of error.

Sitting Democratic Lieutenant Governor Lee Fisher is pitted against Republican Rob Portman, a former Congressman who served as Director of OMB and as US Trade Representative [both, George W Bush], and who is leading in the polls 44% to 40%[1]. Five percent (5%) prefer some other candidate, and 11% are still undecided.

When polling on this race started on March 2, 15% of likely voters in Ohio had a very favorable opinion of Mr Portman, and 10% viewed him very unfavorably. Mr Fisher had very favorables of 15% and very unfavorables of 13%. After winning the primary on May 6, Mr Fisher was viewed very favorably by 13% of likely Ohio voters, and very unfavorably by an identical number (13%). Mr Portman’s very favorables were also at 13% and his very unfavorables were at 6%. Currently, Mr Portman is viewed very favorably by 16% and very unfavorably by 9%, and 27% are undecided. Mr Fisher earns very favorable marks from 13% and very unfavorables from 15%, while 19% are undecided. Since March, Mr Portman’s base has grown by 1-point, while his “anybody but” anti-base has shrunk by a point. Governor Fisher’s base has shrunk by 2-points, and his “anybody but” anti-base has grown by two. This reflects the race as a whole, where the Portman/Fisher numbers have wandered around in a very narrow band with a large number of undecideds (11%).

You can get a feel for Governor Fisher’s predicament by noting that Mr Portman has support from 85% of Republicans, while Mr Fisher is backed by only 69% of Democrats, with Mr Portman leading among voters not affiliated with either major political party by 20 points. The jobless “recovery” is really hurting Democrats in Ohio, where a lot of heavy industry and manufacturing is located. On other issues, 59% of voters favor repeal of ObamaCare. That’s a bit higher than support for repeal nationally. 58% of likely voters in the state disagree with DoJ’s decision to challenge AZ’s new anti-infiltration law in court. That’s comparable to voter sentiments nationally. Opposition to both of these Democratic policies provides a winning majority for the Republicans.

Polling is still inside the margin of error (±4½%), and with a statistically significant number of undecideds (11%), I am carrying Ohio as a Toss Up state, but given the momentum of events (and barring an October surprise), I will probably be moving it to Leans GOP before long.


[1] Rasmussen Reports, Election 2010: Ohio Senate, August 2 2010.


Posted 08-14-2010 9:51 by Eagle Watch

Comments

TVNews wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-14-2010 8:10

Come on Ohio! You can do it!!!

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-15-2010 4:29

I guess Mr. Portman isn't a TeePee candidate or you would have made mention of it in this Blog. Was there a TeePee-endorsed candidate who ran in the primary (and lost) to Portman, I wonder? If so I'm not surprised. The TP movement isn't doing very well in the Rust Belt northeastern / mid-Atlantic states, I'd say. It's true strength is in the Southern and Western states, we know. Those really conservative "Red" states. But hey! Pennsylvania's still to be discussed by you and they have their Tea Party Toomey and last I heard he was definitely favored over Damn Dumb Dem. Sestak...Just an observation by me...

Here's a tongue-in-cheek question: If perchance the good citizens of Ohio elect Mr. Portman to the Senate do you think they'll be surprised and pleased once those heavy industry / manufacturing jobs start flowing back into the state? Or maybe they'll just be happy with the prospect that Big Government will get out of their lives and off their backs and they won't have to worry about paying higher taxes anytime soon. Maybe they are just pining for the opportunity to go down to their local bank and borrow some money--which of course they can't do right now--so they can start up their own little business and become enterprenuers and make lots of money selling their widgets or mowing lawns or fixing broken down cars or something. The "American Dream" in other words...No doubt Mr. Portman will help them along there.

I wonder how well this "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" concept will play with the good citizens of Akron and Dayton and Cleveland and Cincinnati and Youngstown and all the other Ohio rust-belt cities? Well enough I guess. The polls say so. On the other hand maybe these folks are just frightened and disgusted with the current government which hasn't solved their problems yet--after two years of trying--that they are desperate and willing to try anything different? Another new "Change"? I'll bet that's it.  

Eagle Watch wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-15-2010 5:24

There wasn’t a Tea Party-endorsed candidate in this race, though the message of the incompetence of the current administration is resonating.  Unemployment is big issue in those cities that you mention.  Ohio’s unemployment rate is higher than the national rate, and the national rate is two points higher than it was supposed to go if we didn’t act to pass “stimulus”.  You got it right … they’re disgusted with tripling the deficit with nothing to show for it.  

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-16-2010 4:20

I agree that you and the Tea Partiers in Ohio (as in all the state) are disgusted with the tripling of the deficit. It really works when you bring in that talking point about "We're saddling our children and grandchildren..." etc. etc. That appeals to people's emotions and as I have said the way people vote is mostly based on their emotions.

But we both agree that the true decider will be whether or not people are employed. And Ohio's unemployment rate is dismal for sure. So given that, there will simply be no excuse if Portman should lose to Fisher. You worry too much, I think. LOL

Eagle Watch wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-16-2010 4:28

I’m not as worried about Portman as I am about some manufactured “October Surprise” designed to rally the Left … a Wag the Dog scenario.  

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-17-2010 3:55

I have no idea what kind of an "Oct. Surprise--Wag the Dog" scenario you are envisioning. But I do know that all the pundits on the right are warning us about the possibility. If / when it happens, I'll depend upon your analysis to explain the whys and wherefores. In the meantime, I think nothing is going to change substantially before Nov.2, and all signs point to a Triumphant Takeover in the Halls of Congress. Yep.

Eagle Watch wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-17-2010 4:06

October Surprise usually refers to some bold event orchestrated to rally the country around the president just before an election.  I don’t know what they could do either, but I don’t think they’re above trying something.  

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-17-2010 4:15

Well whatever those "Bad People" do, I'll hope and pray that it works! Unlike you though, I don't have the courage of my convictions and I'm not counting on the Democrats to come up with anything spectacular. You are respecting there abilities too much, I think.

Eagle Watch wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-17-2010 4:35

I’m not saying that they will do something (or, if they do, that it will work), just that an October Surprise fits with the heavy-handed style this administration seems to like.  

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-18-2010 3:25

But you and the "American People" are much too wise to succumb to that heavy-handed style. You (and THEY) see right through it. Right? LOL

Eagle Watch wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-18-2010 3:30

Whatever …

TVNews wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-18-2010 13:33

Have you noticed that Libby (like most liberals) starts name calling when she runs out of arguments?

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-19-2010 3:40

Excuse me? Are you saying that my use of the words "American People" is name-calling, TV? You better tell all your friends that. They LOVE to talk about "the American People" and celebrate the fact that they ARE them. As opposed to those "Other" people like me who aren't part of the "American People".

I think what you mean is that I employ sarcastic witticisms to make my point. Which I shouldn't do because it's a wasted effort on my part.

TVNews wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-20-2010 11:33

Libby,

Let me refresh your memory:

"TeePee candidate"

"Tea Party Toomey"

"Publicans"

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-22-2010 3:31

You are right, TV. I stand corrected. I do resort to name-calling and I fail to give all due and proper respect to: The Tea Party Movement, the Grand Old Party, and the RE-Publicans. A respect that they all so richly deserve. I'll try to remember that.

It's hard though...You must remember that I'm a dyed-in-the-wool member of the "Democrat" party. The other party who are nothing more than "Socialist / Nazis". Thanks for reminding me!

TVNews wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-26-2010 19:05

I never said Democrats were Nazis. Doubt I ever will. The Nazis were well organized.

Libby wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-31-2010 4:35

Pardon me, TV. It isn't you but it's people like Limbaugh and Beck and the whole stable of FOXIES and some of the placard-carriers at the Tea Party rallies who maintain that Barack Obama and the "Democrat" Congress are Nazis. I apologize. I'm painting with a broad brush, so to speak.

TVNews wrote re: Anchor of the Rust Belt
on 08-31-2010 8:49

There you go with the name calling again. And, no. No one among the people you have listed have ever referred to Obama as a Nazi.

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?

axcess.me™ is a trademark of Axcess Internet®
The views expressed on personal blogs are the property of the owner and are subject to this disclaimer.