axcess.me™
the Home Stretch

The campaigns are around the clubhouse turn and entering the home stretch – it’s now a sprint to the finish. At this point, all the indicators are for Democrats to take a drubbing: off-year elections nearly always result in losses for the in-power party; whenever the president’s favorables drop below 50% (Gallup has Obama at 44%), his party tends to take heavy losses in the off-year; the achievements of the Democrats are unpopular with the majority of voters – they can’t run on their record in a general.

The Democrats have three things going for them: they have raised more money than the Republicans; Republicans will overplay their hand; and Republicans will underdevelop an alternative agenda.

The money difference is going to be hard to leverage, as the DNC has told candidates that the words “TARP”, “healthcare” and “stimulus” are considered profane. All the Democrats can do is trash their opponents, and the public isn’t fond of negative campaigns. While it might salvage a district here and there, it’s not going to turn the tide. In those close races, it would behoove Republicans to run high-road, issues-based campaigns into the Democrats’ nasty campaigns, but the temptation will be too great, and many Republicans will stoop to the level of their opponents with name-calling and personal attacks. They will overplay the natural advantage they now enjoy.

The Democrats will try to make this election a competition between their vision and a parody of Republican obstructionism. Republicans need to keep the election a referendum on what the Democrats have already done. “We’re the party of ‘no’ because it’s a Constitution of ‘no’ – takeover of car companies; takeover of banking; takeover of student loans; takeover of healthcare.” “Trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see.” “2,000-page bills that nobody reads.” That sort of thing.

A strategy that I would promote would be to have candidates articulate an agenda of triage: stop the bleeding (deny further delusional spending); tie-off uncontrollable spigots (defund ObamaCare – we don’t know if a healthy American economy can afford this entitlement, but we do know if we can right now – we can’t); return unspent stimulus funds to Treasury (end this dysfunctional program); declare social experiments off limits until unemployment gets below 6 percent (no more social engineering until the economy is back up and humming). On the foreign front, tell our allies and enemies that the Great American Apology Tour is over. All of these issue positions poll over 50% nationally. They can all be stated matter-of-factly, without deriding an opponent, and all will keep the Republican out of the gutter while striking a resonant chord with Independent voters.


Posted 09-01-2010 9:34 by Eagle Watch

Comments

TVNews wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-01-2010 13:26

Allen Boyd (Liar-FL) started lying about his opponent two days after the primary. Time to start thinking about anti-Boyd buttons that don't use his name.

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-01-2010 13:41

I don’t know … I still like “a vote for Boyd is a vote for Pelosi”  

Libby wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-02-2010 4:17

You have given very good advice to the Republican candidates. Your old "campaign manager" instincts at work, I think. You should send this blog out to all of them and hope they'll take it to heart.

It looks like the Republicans will most definitely regain the majority in the House at this point. Regardless of what they campaign on, I predict that they will do what Paul Krugman says they will do once they are in charge. Approximately the same thing that the Gingrich-led House did in '04. Let the witch-hunt begin! Sad...Just sayin...

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-02-2010 4:26

I absolutely agree.  If the Republicans are smart, they will resist the temptation to copy the Democrats by trying to criminalize their opponents.  Just get about the business of undoing what they did.  The Republicans can set up the run to 2012 by being better people than the professional Democrats … they’ve already got public opinion behind them – but that’s fickle (just ask the Democrats, who were swept into power by popular demand).  

Libby wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-04-2010 3:22

I'll be watching how each side mounts their campaignSleep closely. As I know you will be too. Right now, the "smart" talking heads / pundits on the right are advising the Republican candidates to do what you have suggested. And then there's the hysterical-media element who are encouraging them to go after the Dems. the minute they get control of the House--and hopefully the Senate too. Start investigating and looking into any possible violation of the law or congressional rules. This is what I think the Reps. will choose to do, but they shouldn't tip their hand during the campaign cycle by saying they will do it. If they are smart they will just run on the "failures' of the Dems. to fix the economy and the unemployment situation. And as you have suggested they need to announce a "plan" [their plan] as to how to go about accomplishing that. I understand they are working on a master plan that they will reveal around Sept. 14. (This according to Michael Steele). So far, so good...From your perspective, that is.

I think the minute they get control of the House they will scrap their campaign-promise plan to fix the economy in favor of going for the jugulars of Obama, Pelosi, Reid, etc. In order to set them up for a possible Presidential win in 2012. If they get control of Congress and the Presidency in 2012, then will be the time to start "fixing" stuff. To work at fixing stuff starting January 2011 might be perceived as a victory for the Obama Admin. "Who figured out a way to work with the Rep. congress and finally started to turn things around." Kind of like what happened with Clinton in '96.

So, if I were advising the Republican party and it's candidates, I would tell them to run a very "high-minded" campaign. And once they are elected concentrate on villifying the Dems. and gumming up the works as much as possible to give them lots of fuel for the big 2012 battle. What do you think of this plan?

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-04-2010 4:06

I’m afraid you’re right, as far what probably will happen.  But no, I wouldn’t advise that route.  I would rather see a Republican-led Congress go about getting the economy going again, whether Obama gets the credit or not.  After all, it hasn’t been forgotten that Clinton never submitted a balanced budget, and that the famous “Clinton surplus” was a product of the Republican Congress and not the White House.  If an opposition Congress draws Obama closer to the center (as it did Clinton), that will be better for the country, and, to me, that’s more important than partisan politics.  

I don’t see that happening, however.  Obama is a pure ideologue, and I’m afraid he’ll ride that horse right off the cliff.  

Libby wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-05-2010 3:33

Well, if Obama "rides that horse right of the cliff" that will be very good news for your side. Ha ha! And I disagree with you when you say it hasn't been forgotten that Clinton never submitted a balanced budget. Nitty-gritty political details such as that have long ago been forgotten by everyone except by "politicos" such as you and me.

And of course we disagree on the whys and wherefores when it comes to how the Clinton Administration managed to balance the budget and leave office with a surplus...I think it was all due to the big economic boost the country got from the Silicon Valley PC revolution. Both the Pres. and the Congress ended up looking great thanks to that fortuitious event. We should all really thank Bill Gates and Steve Jobs for it, but ALL the politicians on either side are perfectly happy to take credit for it! IMHO.

I just read a most interesting article from the WSJ by Peggy Noonan [Sep. 2] which is titled, "How Do You Stop an Elephant Charging?". I found it fascinating because in it she interviewed Grover Norquist to get his opinion on how the Republicans should proceed with their campaign. His opinion reflects exactly what you have purported. He says they must not allow themselves to be distracted by "shiny things". His example of which were the controversy over the mosque debate and the illegal immigration issue. I'm sure you agree with him on the first example. I'm not sure you agree on the second, however?

Lastly, I am now willing to concede defeat in the upcoming election. It is as you and TV predicted over a year ago. There is no good news from any source for we Democrats / Progressives. Even our most committed idealogues agree that it will be a Republican landslide...And this fact leaves me disillusioned and heartsick, of course. But the point I'd like to stress is I fervently hope that your advice will be taken by the Republicans when they take office. Let them proceed ASAP with fixing the economy if they can. Put the good of the country ahead of the good of their party. I want to see how that works, as I have no faith in their solutionSleep. Just sayin'...

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-05-2010 4:10

The literary image of President Obama riding a Pale Horse wasn’t a wish, just an observation.  The continued pummeling of the economy isn’t good for anybody’s “side”.  I think the Arizona predicament could be used selectively – there are some states where this is a real (as opposed to symbolic) issue – but I think it will be over-used, as it polls over 50% nationwide.  How much the Republicans can do depends on their actual gains in November, and what the Lame Duck Congress does to further encumber the economy.  At least, they should gain enough power to stop proliferate spending; at best they can defang ObamaCare and begin to dismantle it (even though President Obama will veto anything that makes to his desk, that can be used against him in 2012).  The mere act of defunding will have a positive effect on the economy by removing part of the uncertainty about future burdens on business.  

TVNews wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-05-2010 15:40

Can't wait to see the voter backlash in Arizona and other border states over President Obama's the Justice Department law suit.

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-05-2010 15:53

Those would be the states where the issue is real.  

Libby wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-06-2010 4:13

Good luck with overturning the Justice Dept.'s lawsuit, both of you. I am serious because as I have said I'm ambivalent on the issue. I can live with the decision whichever way it goes. I do predict however, that the 9th Circuit Ct. of Appeals will uphold the Justice Dept.'s case. You know how liberal they are. And it will get fast-tracked to the Supremes I haven't a doubt. And it should be decided before the 2012 election I think. And that will definitely influence the way people vote then. You agree?

I'd like to change the subject if you don't mind. Assuming the House is won by the Republicans, who do you think they will elect as their Speaker? I've heard lots of chatter that it WON'T be Boehner. The talk in conservative Republican circles [and FOX] is that it will probably be Eric Cantor or maybe Mike Pence. Both staunch conservatives. I think if either would be picked they would be more likely to push the goals you have mentioned, EW. Care to comment?

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-06-2010 4:38

Like you, I’m assuming the 9th Circuit will strike down Arizona’s law, but it doesn’t have to be fast-tracked to go to SCOTUS, as the 9th Circuit is the last stop before Supreme review.  I do think it will be reviewed by SCOTUS before the 2012s.  

I don’t know who the Republicans would elect as speaker if not Boehner, but either Cantor or Pence would be OK with me.  Boehner’s strength for current conditions is that he is a small business owner, and therefore would be sensitive to their needs.  At this point, Skippy the Wonder Dog would better than what we have, so I don’t rate this as one of my primary concerns.  One thing at a time.  

Libby wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-07-2010 2:10

You are mixing apples and oranges! Our own "Skippy the Wonder Dog" has done wonderful things in the opinion of those of us she represents! Hopefully, you've got a big ole' "Rin Tin Tin" waiting somewhere in the wings to take over and rip all those villianous "Enemies of the State" to shreds!!!! Hahahahaha!!

Eagle Watch wrote re: the Home Stretch
on 09-07-2010 3:21

You keep forgetting, I’m talking about what’s good for America, not what’s good for the Democratic or Republican parties.  

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?

axcess.me™ is a trademark of Axcess Internet®
The views expressed on personal blogs are the property of the owner and are subject to this disclaimer.